“Encourage Everyone You Know to Read”
The very best tip I’ve ever seen for good storytelling is something I wholeheartedly believe to be true. If you want to be a good writer and storyteller … read.
I saw that admonition again most recently in my fourth time through “On Writing” by Stephen King.
Read.
Such a simple, profound thing. Don’t limit yourself. Open up your world. Read everything you can lay your hands on. Whether you want to write thrillers, fantasy, science fiction, suspense, romance or action/adventure; before you do anything else … read.
I believe in that advice. I’ve always been an avid reader. I encouraged my sons with it and, now that they’re grown, I’m delighted to see it passed on to my grandchildren. Read.
When they’re too young to read for themselves, read stories to them. The small effort it takes will pay enormous dividends.
Write Like You Read
When it comes to writing, we’ve all seen structural articles galore where professors, “experts” and pundits tell you to outline your plot. Introduce your main characters and themes in the first third of the story. Develop those themes and characters in the second; then resolve it all in the rest.
Really? Those writers had to get advanced degrees to tell us to write a story that people would actually want to read?
Michael Moorcock is one of the more dazzling science fiction writers of our time, having written dozens of novels and short stories since the very early 1960s.
He claims to have followed such a scripted approach and, as I said, he’s a phenomenal story teller. I’ve enjoyed his work immensely.
But when I read his idea of how to go about writing is very like that rigid structure mentioned above, it was a letdown (sorry, Michael).
As his wide audience of fans will attest (and I am one), the man knows how to tell a good story.
That approach to writing, however, if you will pardon me for a moment of brutally honest opinion … is academic bullshit.
I’m much more a follower of Stephen King’s method (see my earlier post). I start with an intriguing what-if? question, then try to visualize what happens. I let the story come to me, then translate what I see and hear in my mind into words on the page.
I suppose, by doing that, I’m ignoring all the proferred rules, regulations, templates and I-told-you-so guidelines and creating my own, suitable for what I want to say.
I’d encourage you to try it, too. At least once.
Of course, if you’re more comfortable with notes and outlines and rigid structure; go for it. It seemed to work for Michael Moorcock, and my own Mrs. Bliss, bless her, if she were still around, would give you bonus points on your report card.
Perhaps the real method is to read good stories, absorb … and repeat. Create your own storytelling process, and judge by the rapt attention of your readers and listeners how it’s working.
Like I mentioned before, it’s the final story that counts … not how you got there.
If you have a moment, please watch the book trailer for REICHOLD STREET.
Tags: award-winning writing, indie writers, self-publishing, storytelling
April 26, 2013 at 10:20 am |
Sounds liberating to me – I find writing notes very difficult and hate doing it and I also find it very difficult to write them up. Splurge first then look to see what the underlying plot etc is and check for contradictions etc.
Obviously makes for a lot of editing. But hey! We need to edit anyway.
LikeLike
April 26, 2013 at 12:17 pm |
I’ve tried it both ways, Rosalie, but found “letting the story come to me” works best … for me. It may well be different for the next writer in the queue and, if their stories are terrific, who am I to quarrel with their method?
And editing … ugh! I did it for many years on many different (and boring) documents while I was working, and I know it’s a necessary evil for producing good fiction, but I’d much rather someone else do it. I may even hire a good editor for my next book … just so I don’t have to do it (it’s HARD doing it for your work).
😮
LikeLike
February 7, 2013 at 10:53 am |
Great stuff!
LikeLike
February 7, 2013 at 10:55 am |
Thank you, Gabriela! 🙂
LikeLike
February 7, 2013 at 10:38 am |
Plotters vs. pantsters. The discussion continues. 😉
LikeLike
February 7, 2013 at 10:52 am |
Yeah … you’re right, Tim. I suppose I was too harsh on Mr. Moorcock and his ilk of plotters. Not everyone enjoys flying by the seat of his/her pants! Must be a suppressed dislike of Mrs. Bliss’ class lessons in English grammar all those years ago! I really did hate diagramming sentences. 😉
LikeLike
February 7, 2013 at 11:10 am |
Remember Polonius.
LikeLike
February 7, 2013 at 11:20 am |
Ow! So now I’ve made a “tedious old fool” of myself? LOL! Serves me right! 🙂
LikeLike
February 7, 2013 at 11:23 am |
Ha ha. Was thinking more of being true to yourself. You’re doing fine, man.
LikeLike